![]() “Making decisions to eradicate our visibility in hockey - by eliminating symbols like jerseys and now Pride Tape - immediately stunts the impact of bringing in more diverse fans and players into the sport,” the statement continued. We are now at a point where all of the progress made and relationships established with our community are in jeopardy” It is now clear that the NHL is stepping back from its long-standing commitment to inclusion and continuing to unravel all of its one-time industry-leading work on 2SLGBTQ+ belonging. In a separate statement, You Can Play, the main partner for the NHL’s LGBTQ+ outreach, wrote via Twitter, “If Hockey is for Everyone, this is not the way forward. “Despite this setback, we are encouraged for what lies ahead based on our recent conversations from every corner of the sport. “Seven years ago, Pride Tape was born out of adversity as a grassroots hockey initiative that remains resilient, and optimistic about our plans with hockey clubs, organizations, and their partners at every level,” Pride Tape wrote. In a statement published on Instagram, Pride Tape said it was “extremely disappointed” by the NHL’s decision and had received numerous messages of support over the last 24 hours. But won’t stand up for them in the face of a few homophobes.” ![]() Queerty noted that the Thursday memo specified that “specialty jerseys may be sold as merchandise, they just can’t be on the ice,” meaning that “the NHL is still happy to take LGBTQ+ fans’ money. Proceeds from the sale of the rainbow-colored tape have gone towards LGBTQ+ youth outreach and educational initiatives, Pride Tape’s website states. The aforementioned website also confirmed that the NHL has banned individual players from applying Pride Tape onto their hockey sticks. ![]() The broadly written “clarification” could technically mean that players could refuse to be on the ice if there is a drag queen, a gay men’s chorus singing the National Anthem, or even out gay players present, the LGBTQ+ sports website Outsports noted. A factor that may be considered in this regard includes, for example, whether a Player (or Players) is required to be in close proximity to any groups or individuals visibly or otherwise clearly associated with such Special Initiative(s).” The new memo said, in part, “Players shall not be put in the position of having to demonstrate (or where they may be appearing to demonstrate) personal support for any Special Initiatives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |